I advocate the disappearance of the humanities, arts and sports field from state-sponsorship. Consider the existence of an activity may well be justified in the taste of its practitioners, but not it's OK to squander public funds to perpetuate what is ultimately personal hobbies. And do not say it with resentment.
.
.
likely to me that if I was offered a position at the University or someone committed the folly of giving me a scholarship, would accept without delay and in some way, would use that advantage. But deep down would not think (even if the mouth could say to outside) that I'm holding an undeserved money.
.
.
.
All assumed a posture of "thinking" of the company, which attributed the mission of the Comptroller reflective of social processes, is strongly opposed to money being wasted in this or that they recognize that many people in need of major issues related to survival. However, when someone proposes that the funds are coming to them which are used for redistribution, immediately raise the pitiful flag culture and humanity and the oligarchs ranchers spoke from a yacht in Nice sacrifice of countryside that rises every day at six in the morning thinking about the good it does to the country.
.
.
.
However, if state coffers are overflowing, if people's real needs are met, the state can begin to think about investing that money in cultural or sporting but taking into account the aspect of real social relevance of these (something that is nothing but a purely formal requirement and completed merely to comply with a form).
.
.
.
.
Thus, the anti-academic is a just retribution for those who have (or have ever had) the childish pretense that someone would subsidize our refined - even sterile - intellectual onanism. Privately, let everyone do what they want.
0 comments:
Post a Comment